Nick Clegg wants to ditch Digital Economy Bill... or does he?

19 April 2010

Sick of the sight of him yet?

A while ago, we told you about the Liberal Democrats being a bit simple minded when tackling the Digital Economy Bill. Clegg & Co. wanted an amendment in the bill that would allow national web-censorship and, worse still, in a leaked document, suggested that the party were taking orders from the British Phonographic Institute.

Essentially, the recording industry told the LibDems what to say and essentially, wrote their proposal for them.

On the back of a good performance in the televised leadership debate, Clegg is going all out for a charm offensive by saying that he wants the Digital Economy Bill to be "repealed".

Says Clegg: "We did our best to prevent the Digital Economy Bill being rushed through at the last moment. It badly needed more debate and amendment, and we are extremely worried that it will now lead to completely innocent people having their internet connections cut off."

"It was far too heavily weighted in favour of the big corporations and those who are worried about too much information becoming available. It badly needs to be repealed, and the issues revisited."

It seems that everyone is in agreement that the LibDems have always opposed the controversial bill, despite the fact it was LibDem lords who pushed for a clause to be inserted which stated that "The High Court shall have power to grant an injunction against a service provider, requiring it to prevent access to online locations specified in the order of the Court.

It's obvious that the Digital Economy Bill could be a real vote will in the lead up to the election, with many of the first-time voters being far more interested in their rights online as opposed to fiscal promises and foreign policy. They want tunes and YouTube.

However, the Guardian was contacted by the party who wanted to clarify Clegg's call to repeal this bill, saying that "most of the bill" is welcome... they just don't like the idea of cutting off people's internet.  The Lib Dems would "take it off the statue book and replace it with something better".

The Lib Dems are playing the indignant card on this and stating that they wanted a more thorough debate on the whole thing, despite the fact only a quarter of the MPs attended the debate itself. There's something fishy about all of this and to my mind, it reeks of electioneering.

What do you think?

TOPICS:   Technology

8 comments

  • Maude
    I would ask the Lib Dems what a "statue book" is.
  • F. F.
    Bar Anus
  • Mogwai
    I was under the impression that all Lib Dem MP's voted against it. http://www.theyworkforthebpi.com/
  • Chris
    Smells like bullshit.
  • Jose
    BW getting political? And worse, taking sides?! Tut-tut, boys....
  • dunfyboy
    No Mogwai, they didn't. My MPs a lib dem and he couldn't even be arsed attending.
  • The B.
    My local MP is Lib Dem and voted against, it's about the only thing he's done in the last 10 years of any worth, although he will turn up to the opening of an envelope if it gets his face in the local rag.
  • toryburch
    Strivectin SD cream tory burch shoes sales is effective. tory burch flat sale Ingredients include Acetyl Hexapeptide-8, reva flats on sale Pentapeptide 3 and Oligopeptide,

What do you think?

Connect with Facebook, Twitter, or just enter your email to sign in and comment.

Your comment