Super-wealthy pay super-low tax while the Government robs charities. Nice.

16 April 2012

It’s a hard life being a multi-millionaire. If it wasn’t tough enough thinking of ways to spend all that lovely cash, you also have to spend ages working out how to pay as little tax as possible. New Treasury figures have revealed that of the very top earners in the UK, 6% pay less than 10% in income tax, with a further 23% paying an average rate of tax of less than 40%.

Of course, this is an average tax rate, not marginal (highest) rate of tax paid, so the average rate of a standard higher rate tax payer earning, say, £50k will not be 40%. However, it will probably be a darned site higher than 10%*. In fact, the average rate for someone earning over £10m should be 49.78%

The full set of figures released by the Treasury are detailed below, and these show that the very highest earners are also the ones avoiding most of the tax- where incomes fall between £500k and £10m a higher proportion (over 80%) of taxpayers cough up over 40% in tax. As has ever been the case, it it those with the most money, and the most to lose in tax, that are largely the only ones who can afford the complicated tax planning required to substantially reduce their chargeable income.

A Treasury spokeswoman said: "There are currently millionaires paying a lower tax rate than ordinary taxpayers. This is the system we have at the moment, but the Government is committed to making it fairer. We're capping benefits and these figures clearly show why it's fair to cap tax reliefs for the wealthy as well."

average tax rates

So, given these figures show the huge financial cost of the super-wealthy’s tax avoidance, why would the Treasury choose to make these figures public? There are two reasons- the recent Budget outlined proposals for a new cap on tax reliefs to prevent more than 25% of income being relieved from tax (excluding pension contribution relief and ES relief), so they are proving there is a problem that they are already solving. The second reason is to try and fight the backlash against a certain application of the proposed new rule.

One way in which tax liabilities can legitimately be reduced is through charitable giving. Under the Gift Aid system, donations made to charities are assumed to be made net of basic rate (20%) tax. A basic rate donor simply makes their donation, and the charity can reclaim 20% of the grossed up value (works out at 28p per £1) directly from HMRC.

However, if you are a higher rate taxpayer, the difference between the basic rate relief claimed by the charity and the highest rate of tax you pay, which could be the 50% rate of tax, can be claimed as a deduction on a tax return. It’s a win win win situation- the charity gets money from the donor and the taxman, the donor gets additional tax relief and HMRC forks out twice.

However, this new 25% cap on reliefs will also apply to charitable donations where gift aid is claimed. Which means that certain charities favoured by wealthy benefactors could find themselves short of a few bob.

These Treasury figures are meant to show that the Goverment aren’t evil overlords stealing money from charities, they are merely evil overlords trying to minimise tax avoidance. But this is proving a difficult sell for them. Chancellor George has already indicated he might ‘negotiate’ on the effect of the cap for charities, and a recent poll by ComRes found that out of 71 coalition MPs asked, 46 agreed that charity donations should not be subject to the new limit, 10 refused to express any kind of opinion, and only 15 supported their own Government’s policy.

And is it actually a goer? Tax avoidance isn’t really that “morally reprehensible” if avoiders are only getting back a percentage of what they have genuinely donated to charity surely? Is it right that the Government is banking on clawing back "£50m-£100m"** of money from Gift Aid donations that will not be made in 2016/17 in order to prop up their failing coffers?

* it  actually works out at a neat 20%, in case you are interested.

** Treasury secretary David Gauke on the BBC Radio 4 Today Programme.



  • klingelton
    My brain hurts
  • The B.
    I was under the impression that loophole was to set up an offshore charity in your own name for something like Tarquin and Cressida's schooling fund and then chuck your entire salary at it, you get to claim back the 50% tax and pay nowt and then spend the Tarquin and Cressida money on schooling your children or paying for their Chelsea flat?
  • Mike H.
    Rob Children In Need first, that'll keep the population down a bit, I mean, who wants weak little scroats requireing 24hr attention and making us fucking pay for the little shites!
  • Mary H.
    What if your kid's aren't called Tarquin and Cressida, Bob?
  • Mr G.
    The rich get richer,the poor get poorer
  • Mary H.
    My kids are called, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (7 died from drug overdose) 8, and Zinthia, Nevaeh, Shanequie-Peighton, Haiyleh, Cheyenne, Jaede.Charmaine & TashaDee. There's a couple of other little shits, but I don't know where the fuck they are, I don't care either, they just make me money.
  • SgtMunky
    I know most people hate rich people because they are rich, but imagine working your ass off at school and netting the rare career path that ends up with you becoming a CEO of a massive corporation. 50% of your earnings go to the government? Thats MASSIVE! Yeah, 10m is a HUGE pay check, but so is giving half of it away to a government that spunks it on aid for countries whose economies are better than our's, and homes for people that can't be assed to work There comes a point when instead of trying to get more tax money off citizens, rich or poor, the government should start looking to fix the massive sized fucking holes in their pockets/banking system/logic/brain.
  • PokeHerPete
    Hey Mary, fancy another money earner? My balls aren't very good so you could claim extra benefits for them being thick as shit too!
  • The B.
    @Mary Hinge, then you're obviously not rich enough to be able to set up an offshore charity.
  • The B.
    @SgtMunky - You're not wrong but then you end up sacking half the civil service and people that work for local authorities, and unemployment North of Watford hits 75%.
  • Zleet
    This is terrible, unless I was to become rich; in which case it would be great.
  • Mike H.
    Tax the rich to pay for the chavs.
  • C.U.N.T
    Who says you need to work your tits off at school to become a CEO? That's bollocks, most of the CEOs I have known are thick as shite. They just need to make a decision, most of them fail, then move to the next CEO job.
  • Mike m.
    @ Mary To keep it easy, my 6 boys are called Mike, Mike, Mike, Mike, Mike and Mike. If I want just one of them, I call them after their Dad's surname (if I can remember it).
  • Mike H.
    Damn it, wish I hadn't used that out of date rubber I'd had in my box of nails.
  • Kevin
    Noone is stopping people giving money away, only getting big tax relief in return. So what this really means is that the big charities expect rich people to not be as public minded as before? Or that the very rich big charities won't be living on their gravy train for much longer?
  • Mr G.
    Management is the art of delegation.If your a CEO get others below you to do all the work and take all the shit when it goes wrong
  • Al
    Ok, here's some free tax advice. You can use the same method as rich people to reduce the tax you pay to the government. If you earn £21k a year then you'll be paying £2580 in tax. All you need to do is donate £10320 to charity and you're paying no tax ... 0%! You can take home the remaining £6500 safe in the knowledge that the government hasn't received a penny of it.
  • Mark T.
    Guaranteed that almost all of the £10m+ earners are non-UK domiciles, who only pay tax on UK source income, so park it all offshore. You get penalised for being born here! Regarding the charity issue, as far as I'm concerned, almost all charities are a better cause than the public coffers. The chances of the money actually being put to good use is far greater!

What do you think?

Connect with Facebook, Twitter, or just enter your email to sign in and comment.

Your comment