UK banks face £4.5billion bill after judicial review

20 April 2011

banksThe swines that run the UK's banks won't be happy this morning after they collectively lost a judicial review which could see them hit with a £4.5 billion fine after claims that they mis-sold loan insurance.

Banks are now going to have to look back on past sales of Payment Protection Insurance (PPI), taking into consideration every policy, including those taken out by people who haven't complained.

The British Bankers' Association (BBA) are said to be "disappointed" by the ruling and has 21 days to appeal. There'll be a lot of teeth gnashing and clenching of fists going on, that's for sure.

Already, thousands have already received compensation on PPI policies, which were supposed to repay one's loans if income dropped thanks to illness or loss of employment. The banks challenged the Financial Services Authority (FSA) over guidelines published last year which said that banks needed to contact all past PPI customers and ask them to complain if they were under the impression that they'd been mis-sold of policy. However, High Court judge, Mr Justice Ouseley, rejected the challenge.

Natalie Ceeney, the chief financial ombudsman, said: "This judgment is very clear-cut - and it confirms that the ombudsman's approach to PPI complaints is right. People have been waiting a long time while the banks' legal action has been ongoing. I would now like to see financial businesses showing real commitment to sorting out their customers' complaints efficiently and promptly."

Of course, there have been many PPI sales sold which were appropriate, however, largely, it has been suggested that our beloved banks have been mis-selling them and raking in millions of pounds from selling insurance that people just didn't need, couldn't claim on or, indeed, weren't even aware they had.

If the banks appeal is unsuccessful, customers will be repaid their PPI premiums plus interest. Thus far, there's been more than 200,000 cases referred to the ombudsman with around three in four complaints being upheld.

TOPICS:   Investments   Insurance   Economy   Debt


  • afro-left
    Who cares???
  • Jerec
    I do, and so should you. Its these Banks that are supposed to be working for us, that a lot of them are owned by the state since the recession. All banks are bastards in my eyes though.
  • NGIH T.
    Its these Banks that are supposed to be working for us, that a lot of them are owned by the
  • charitynjw
    A partial move back to sanity - now we need to reverse that travesty of justice that was allowed in the Banks-v-OFT case in the HoL/Supreme Court in 2009! & if the banks appeal this one, I trust that the fat cats will forgo their ludicrous salaries to fund it!!
  • mike o.
    wheres this money coming from then?... oh yea us.... no one wins

What do you think?

Your comment