Cuts to alcohol duty are shameful and a total disgrace

23 March 2015

 Most people will have been at least mildly pleased with last week’s Budget, with a number of small giveaways that will generally have a positive effect on the pocket. One group of announcements that most will have filed under positive news were those relating to sin taxes on beer, cider and spirits, which have been cut by 1p and 2% respectively. But apparently we’re all wrong, with the duty cuts being described as “shameful” and “a total disgrace”.

The Alcohol Health Alliance, which is comprised of medical bodies, charities and alcohol health campaigners, has come out in strict disapproval of the cuts, and the freeze on wine duty,  with Professor Sir Ian Gilmore, chair of the Alcohol Health Alliance, claiming the cuts were evidence that the chancellor had prioritised the interested of big business over public health.

“This decision is a slap in the face to our doctors, nurses and emergency services on the front line that are paying the price for this cut”, he said. “With over one million alcohol-related hospital attendances every year, our NHS simply cannot afford for alcohol to get cheaper.

“The government’s own figures show that alcohol-related harm costs the UK £21 billion every single year. With less than half of this recouped through current levels of taxation, to suggest lowering taxes even further is thoroughly shameful. These cuts also mean that cheap, strong alcohol that gets into the hands of our children will be even more affordable now,” he finished, not mincing his words.

Katherine Brown, director of the Institute of Alcohol Studies agreed, calling the decision to cut tax on cider and spirits at a time when the NHS is at “breaking point”  a “total disgrace”.

So why did the Chancellor do it? Is he hoping to woo beer drinkers in advance of May’s election? Possibly. However, the subject of alcohol duties has been a subject of sustained campaigning by the trade, specifically the Wine and Spirit Trade Association (WSTA) who welcomed the cuts to the “extremely high” rates of duty paid by UK drinkers. But as part of the Drop the Duty! Campaign, the arguments for a cut in alcohol duties are that cheaper prices will stimulate this area of the economy, and lead to greater prosperity and more jobs.

Independent analysis commissioned by the WSTA and carried out by Ernst Young showed that a 2% cut in duty would boost public finances by £1.5 billion. David Frost, chief executive of the Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) said the cuts send an “important signal on fair taxation” to the Scotch industry’s export markets; the SWA previously blamed the 5% decline of the UK market for Scotch whisky in 2014 on the country’s “excessive” levels of tax on spirits.

So what do you think? Will a penny saved in duty result in more alcohol-related NHS spending, or will it just mean our pockets are ever so slightly fuller after a night out?

TOPICS:   Health   Government


  • Ol P.
    Don't know what they are bleating about, because any reduction in a pint due to beer duty stands as much chance of being passed to the customer as me going to the moon...
  • Mad B.
    Lets be honest, tax on ciggies and booze are having NO EFFECT on hard-core smokers and boozers. Time for a rethink :- Perhaps with the NHS rationing that increasingly occurs, we should stop allowing free treatment for smoking and alcohol related diseases. (Perhaps then, the NHS will have the funds to treat my rare Auto-immune illness instead).
  • Ryan w.
    @Mad from Barking I gave up smoking mainly because the cost was so high. The price for 20 has nearly doubled in a few years. I'm glad it did. Smokers and drinkers aren't given priority for things like organ transplants anyway. At least alcohol makes for a good night and allows many people to have some fun after a long week working. Smoking does no good.
  • Mad B.
    @Ryan In my family there are two hard-core smokers, my sister only gave up when she needed IVF treatment; prior to that her ciggie habit was costing more than her mortgage ( I worked it out based on the average number of ciggies I witnessed being smoked - ~2.5 packs per day). My brother claims to have given up - but only because as a fireman, the divisional surgeon told him he would be taken off of front-line duties he he didnt stop. He hasnt stopped, as any visit to his "divorced bachelor" pad will show/smell. BTW, Both our paternal grandfather AND our father died of smoking related cancers and/or cancer treatment after-effects, and our mother has also had cancer. None of this deterred either of them. A friend of mine also smokes heavily - on average I see him light a roll-up at least every 30 minutes. Tghe price HAS changed his habits though, he now asks everyone he knows who is flying through UAE to buy him some baccie in duty free.
  • Father J.
    They would do better to get in a lather about the fat, salt and chemical-ridden dogshit 'food' that the great unwashed shovel down their necks on a daily basis.

What do you think?

Your comment