Posts Tagged ‘tickets’
A load of cinemas in the UK and Ireland were teasing people last night on social media, but now, we’re here with a new trailer set to air today as well. Nerdgasm.
You have to wonder how quickly these will sell out, don’t you?
And, for full geekjaculation, there’s a new Star Wars poster to look at for the new film, which is very nice and Star Warsy. Look at it here.
Anyway, the film will be shown on December 18th, so get cracking if you want to be one of the first to watch it.
Like all big events, scamsters are swarming around the Rugby World Cup. An investigation by Which!!! has uncovered rip-off deals for those trying to get to Twickenham, where money is stumped up, but tickets don’t arrive.
One of the sites that has been singled out is GetSporting.com, who appear to be offering tickets for games that have sold out. They seem to have hundreds of tickets, including every England match and the final, but do they have the tickets?
Which!!! say: “We’ve found one website – GetSporting.com – offering deals that may be too good to be true, selling tickets for sold out matches like England v Australia and England v Wales. It appears consumers are unlikely to receive tickets or could even receive fake ones.”
GetSporting.com seems to have an infinite supply of tickets for England’s opener against Fiji on September 18th, and the site isn’t keen on telling you where your seat in the stadium will be, or what the face value of the ticket is. If you’re reselling tickets for an event, by law, you have to disclose both of these things – so keep an eye out for that.
Which!!! continued: “Its payment methods have also given us cause for concern. It’s offering a discount for people who pay for their tickets through wire transfer but this method of payment means it’s almost impossible to get your money back if something goes wrong.”
The ubiquitous Richard Lloyd from Which!!! says: “With fans trying to get last minute tickets to Rugby World Cup 2015, it’s an ideal time for ticket scammers to try to make a fast buck.”
“We expect the authorities to take swift action against dodgy sites and we advise people to keep their wits about them. If an offer looks too good to be true, it probably is.”
We all know that our train services are run badly and are expensive, so the news that rail fares have shot up three times faster than our wages have over the past five years, should come as no surprise.
New analysis shows that regulated fare prices went up by 25% between 2010 and 2015, while the average take home pay only went up by 9% in that same time. This is according to the TUC who have been crunching some numbers.
Rail minister Claire Perry says that the government has plans that would see an end to ”inflation-busting fare increases”, and the powers that be have already said that regulated train fares (in England only) will rise by no more than inflation. Perry added: “Next year’s fares will see some of the lowest increases for decades.”
Hands up if you’ll only believe that when you see it.
The unions aren’t having it, and they think that returning the railways to the public sector would see a reduction in train ticket prices. TUC secretary Frances O’Grady said too many people commuting on trains are “seriously out of pocket” thanks to price hikes: “If ministers really want to help hard-pressed commuters they need to return services to the public sector. It would allow much bigger savings to be passed onto passengers”.
Just how much do they think will be saved? Well, the TUC and rail union campaign ‘Action For Rail’ thinks that putting the trains into public ownership would see £1.5bn saved over the next five years. A lot of the money would be saved after being recouped from the money private train firms pay in dividends to shareholders.
The transport charity Campaign for Better Transport have conducted a separate report and found that, again unsurprisingly, the UK if way behind the rest of Europe when it comes to flexible train tickets.
At the moment, season ticket holders in Britain only actually save money if they use their tickets for five out of seven days. People with part-time jobs are getting done over.
“The UK government and train operators are dragging their feet, meaning many part-time workers are being priced off the railway,” said campaigner Martin Abrams.
The circletickets.com site isn’t online any more, at it looks like their tickets won’t ever be showing up.
Action Fraud have received 228 reports of ticket fraud relating to the company, which has subsequently been passed onto the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau. Obviously, best to give anything relating to this company a wide berth for the foreseeable.
It doesn’t look like you’ll be able to get your hands on your tickets, which is a kick in the teeth, but you might be able to get your money back.
Like most dodgy transactions, if you paid for goods with your credit card and spent over £100, you should be able to get your cash back under the Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act. You need to contact the people you have your credit card with for that.
If you spent less, or paid by direct debit or debit card, you can ask the people you have your card with to use chargeback in order to get you your money back.
Also, if you think you’ve been done out of money fraudulently, then you should be a good sport and report any dodgy companies to Action Fraud.
Secondary ticketing can be a minefield. If you aren’t lucky enough to get tickets first time round, from the official retailer, being able to find tickets that people can no longer use- or when people just want to make a profit on their tickets- is a valuable service to consumers. However, the whole secondary ticket market has been subject to a Competition and Markets Authority (CMA, the new OFT) as they were concerned that consumers were shopping without full information, preventing them from making an informed purchasing decision. Now, 4 of the largest UK secondary ticket platforms – GET ME IN!, Seatwave, StubHub and viagogo – have promised to pull their collective socks up and provide improved information to buyers about the tickets listed on their sites- including original face value.
While no-one is saying that ticket resellers can’t charge more than face value for tickets, particularly those hot tickets that sold out in nine seconds, the CMA want the face value to be clearly stated so that those buying them are explicitly aware of the premium they are paying. Other undertakings adopted by the resellers include information on restricted entry conditions (eg for children) and restricted view, whether or not multiple seats that are listed together are located together and whether there are any additional charges not included in the listed ticket price. They will also all provide a contact email address for buyers to use if something goes wrong.
But the CMA isn’t stopping there. They are also writing to other major ticket resellers and businesses to inform them of the CMA’s “expectations about their conduct and their obligations under consumer law”. They have also produced a handy guide for consumers so you know what to look for when buying tickets from a reseller.
Nisha Arora, CMA Senior Director, said:
“A well-functioning secondary ticket market benefits fans by helping them to get tickets for events they want to see and by helping them when they can no longer make use of their tickets. As a result of the CMA’s action, and the constructive response of the major secondary ticket platforms, buyers will now have more of the key information they need before buying.”
“Businesses that do not provide secondary ticket consumers with information they need to help them know what they are buying may find themselves subject to action under consumer protection law, including possible financial penalties from Trading Standards Services to drive future compliance.”
Shahriar Coupal (Advertising Standards Authority) said:
“Hiding or omitting information about charges that consumers have to pay is not only misleading it’s simply unfair. In tandem with the CMA, we’ve been working closely with the secondary ticket sector to help make sure it’s clear and upfront about costs so that consumers get a fair deal and businesses play by the same rules.”
Buying tickets for a sporting or music event is often wildly frustrating. When an event sells out, then punters find themselves looking for resales, and it is here that people from the world of entertainment and sports want a rethink.
They’d like to see new controls on websites selling event tickets and would like to see resellers publishing the names of ticket sellers and face value of tickets, in a bid to stop fans getting ripped off. There’s a letter, which was published in the Independent which was signed by heads of sporting and cultural bodies, as well as the management companies of entertainers.
This is a bid to stop touts making a fast buck and, indeed, control the market that resells tickets for needlessly inflated prices. The Department of Culture, Media and Sport are on record as saying that they don’t see a change in law happening, but the industry is pushing MPs to do something as secondary ticketing sites are able to add whatever surcharges they like, getting themselves a nice commission.
So, if these companies buy tickets for a popular event in bulk, they can resell them for profit, meaning that tickets at face-value aren’t getting into the hands of the people trying to attend the event. This is undermining the efforts of sum to keep ticket prices fair.
The letter says: “It’s high time the government stopped sticking up for secondary platforms, and decided to put fans first.” They want to see measures that ensure secondary ticketing platforms publish; the name of the seller and whether they are affiliated to a larger organisation; the face value of the ticket; whether the resale contravenes terms and conditions agreed to by the original buyer and the seat number of the ticket.
These proposals have been suggested as a change to the Consumer Rights Bill
Of course, this would be a win for both sides – if a band cares about fans getting face-value tickets, they’ll be happy. Also, it means profits go to the band’s organisations, rather than being siphoned off by someone creating false demand.
The government’s culture spokesman, Viscount Younger of Leckie, thinks that forcing companies to play along with this isn’t needed, saying: ”I believe that a voluntary approach with improved guidance and with better point-of-sale electronic means to control ticketing is the way forward.”
If you’ve ever bought a ticket to a gig or event, you will probably have shouted at your computer screen about astronomical booking fees and credit card charges.
And for good reason. In fact, random and unclear extra charges on gig tickets can sometimes add up to 38% of the price of the actual tickets. That’s according to Which!, who also found that some ticket agencies are breaking the LAW by adding on the sneaky charges without telling anyone.
For example, Which! mystery shoppers bought a ticket to see Jimmy Carr (will these people stop at nothing to protect the consumer??) from the See Tickets website. On top of the £25 for the ticket, there was a £3 booking fee and a whopping £6.50 ‘transaction fee’. Ticketweb, who give Ryanair a run for their money, also charged customers £2.50 for printing out their tickets at home.
7 out of 20 ticket agencies failed to reveal their hidden charges upfront, which breaches a code of practice by the ASA. Which! are now urging ticketing companies to be nice with their ‘Play Fair’ campaign, and stop ripping off their customers with stupid fees.
And here’s Richard Lloyd, standing on stage, mic in hand, wearing a pair of leather chaps.
‘Consumers tell us they are feeling ripped off by the level of ticketing charges, and the lack of transparency means it is almost impossible for people to compare prices when booking online. We want to see the ticketing industry ‘Play Fair on Ticket Fees’, so all charges are displayed upfront and with a clear explanation of what they’re for.’
The Government have announced that they’re curbing train operators’ ability to increase ticket prices in 2014. Thus far, rail companies have been able to slap on an additional 5% to fares, provided the average rise of regulated fares is maintained at 1% above inflation. However, that will now be limited to 2%.
It isn’t a decrease, but it is better than a kick in the arse.
The rise in the new year will be based on the July 2013 RPI inflation rate, which means the old flexible system has gone, and thereby ending tickets going up by eye-watering amounts (some season tickets could have gone up by nearly 10% under the old rules).
This review was published today by Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin, who said: ”By capping fares we are protecting passengers from large rises at a time when family incomes are already being squeezed. We will need to wait for the rail industry to calculate individual ticket prices for next year, but this cap could save some commuters as much as £200 a year.”
The review also looks at a potential end to paper tickets, flexible season tickets and a code of conduct for train companies in the hope that they’ll actually give passengers some confidence that they are getting the best deal for their journey.
McLoughlin added: “Today is just the start of a Government-wide programme to help hardworking people and reduce the cost of living. The Government will be announcing a range of initiatives to help put money back in people’s pockets over the next few weeks. Alongside this, the Government is investing over £16bn to transform our rail network, which will make sure we can respond to increasing passenger demand and drive forward economic growth that will help strengthen our economy.”
Elengo -who I like to imagine as a dark handsome type in a fedora carrying a guitar case in the desert – doesn’t exist on the UK Electoral roll, but he’s still managed to con people who have been selling festival tickets online.
The scam is as follows: Elengo snaps up your gig tickets using PayPal. Some time later, he/it/them orders a ‘chargeback’ on the payment, which is the facility you can use to get your money back if your goods don’t arrive or are unsatisfactory.
After a BBC Wales documentary exposed the scam, they got a reply from someone claiming to be Elengo, who complained that he received the tickets and it was PayPal’s fault. The plot thickens…
With dozens of victims taking to the Internet to complain about the fraud, PayPal has since closed Elengo’s account. But don’t be surprised if he springs up in another guise. If Stelios Shufflebottom or Regina Felangi contacts you wanting to buy Glastonbury tickets, report it to the eBay police, OK?
The ASA is going to town on those who sell theatre tickets with “misleading hidden costs”, after ruling against four theatre websites. If they could have a pop at pointless costs attached to gig tickets as well, that’d be great.
The Old Vic, Ambassador Theatre Group, the AKA Group’s site for A Chorus of Disapproval and Charing Cross Theatre all gave misleading ticket prices, said the watchdog, noting that up to £3 extra in costs were being slapped on, and it wasn’t exactly clear why.
ASA’s chief executive Guy Parker said: “We are clamping down on misleading hidden costs. The rulings about advertised prices for theatre tickets make clear that sellers must include all compulsory fees and charges in quoted ticket prices and be more up-front about booking fees.”
“These pricing practices are simply not fair. They draw us in on a false promise. Our rulings send a clear signal to advertisers: sort out your pricing so we all get a fair deal.”
A statement from the Ambassador Theatre Group said: “The ASA advised us that informing customers at the beginning of the booking process that a fee or charge may apply and to then confirm the amount of that fee later in the booking process needed revision.”
“We have embarked on a series of improvements to the information on our website to ensure that ticket prices and any fees charged for purchasing online are clearly available to customers at the beginning of the booking process as well.”
They then flounced off quoting Shakespeare before talking to themselves in the mirror, blind drunk on gin and turps, before taking it out on a lackey and trying to make improper passes at them. Probably.
A BBC investigation has learned that that almost 350,000 parking fines (totalling £23m) might have been issued unlawfully to London motorists. The investigation will be screen on Inside Out, on BBC1 London at 7.30pm on Monday, and will be viewable on iPlayer afterwards.
It all hinges on a ticket that was issued in a suspended parking bay in Camden, where the council didn’t have authorization for the signage. The sleuths at the Beeb have learned that 14 councils still have no authorisation for the signage. Which is a bit embarrassing.
In a stunning piece of loopholery, it seems that the Department for Transport (DfT) designs road signs for most situations, which authorities must use, but it has never produced a suspended parking bay sign. If no sign is set out by the DfT, the law says councils must ask the transport secretary to authorise their own creations.
The aforementioned 14 councils have no authorisation for their own versions of the signs while others didn’t get authorisation for years.
The councils with no DfT authorisation for their signs are: Greenwich, Southwark, Westminster, Barnet, Bexley, Bromley, Croydon, Ealing, Hillingdon, Kingston-upon-Thames, Merton, Redbridge, Sutton and Waltham Forest.
The following councils received authorisation in 2010 or after: Camden, Islington, Hackney, Lambeth, Harrow, Wandsworth, Havering, Barking and Dagenham, Brent, Newham, Hounslow, Lewisham and Haringey.
Essentially, if you’ve received a ticket relating to a suspended parking bay from one of those councils, you could have a strong case for challenging it. Find out more on Inside Out or by consulting the forums at PePiPoo.
As we all know, the price of train tickets has been leaping wildly upward for too long, with some going up by double in ten years. And are our trains running more efficiently and all shiny and new? Arse they are.
And so, ministers – far too late to the party, as usual – are saying that future price hikes could be scrapped. Rail minister Norman Baker said he wanted to stop further increases, but showed typical insensitivity by saying that current fares were ‘not nearly as expensive as is being presented’.
Tell that to those who have seen tickets going up by almost 90% and everyone else who has noticed that fares have outstripped salary rises.
Baker said: ‘We want to end the era of above-inflation rises as soon as we possibly can, and we’re working towards that. I’m engaged in the fares and ticketing review… which will aim to make fares more transparent and simpler for the passenger. I think in an ideal world we wouldn’t be having fare increases above inflation.’
Stephen Joseph, chief executive of Campaign for Better Transport said: “The impact of successive Government’s policies on rail fares is appalling. It’s truly shocking that we have deliberately made getting the train to work an extravagance that many struggle to afford. The time has come not just to stop the rises but to reduce fares.”
Michael Roberts, chief executive of the Association of Train Operating Companies (ATOC), said: “We understand commuters don’t like to pay more to travel to work but it is the government, not train companies, that decides how much season tickets should rise on average each year. Successive governments have required train companies to increase the average price of season tickets every January since 2004 by more than inflation. Ministers want passengers to pay a larger share of railway running costs to reduce the contribution from taxpayers while sustaining investment in better stations, new trains and faster services.”
Bob Crow, leader of the RMT transport union, spits: “Passengers getting another inflation-busting kick in the teeth know that their hard-earned cash is being bled out of the railways and into the pockets of a bunch of spivs and chancers.”
The Rolling Stones are BACK! Yes, AGAIN! Arguably the world’s biggest still-surviving rock and roll act, Jagger, Richards, Watts, Wood, Jones, Starr, Holder and Bullard have announced a few gigs to help promote their new 50th anniversary greatest hits album.
It all sounds pretty good until you look at the cost of the tickets for their show at the O2 Arena, formerly know as the Millennium Dome. The cheapest ones are £106 and they go up all the way to a whopping £406. Yes, £406! Those prices include some fairly mammoth booking fees as well (£31 in the case of the most expensive tickets).
Are the Stones worth that amount of money (bear in mind that they probably won’t be doing this kind of thing for that much longer)? Is any artist worth that amount of money? TELL US!*
(*before noon on Tuesday)
We all like to laugh, and one of the country’s most popular laugh-bringers is Sarah Millican. But Sarah has just rebranded herself as a consumer champion as well, making a stand against unscrupulous theatres and their vile ticket fees.
Sarah has announced a vast UK tour for 2013/14 but she WON’T be setting foot in any of the 39 venues owned by the Ambassador Theatre Group, and it’s all because of the added fees they slap on to the cost of the tickets for their shows.
On her site, Sarah says:
‘Some of you will notice that I’m not playing some of the venues I played on my last tour, those venues are owned and run by The Ambassador Theatre Group. I don’t agree with the extra charges ATG put on top of the face value ticket price to you the customer and a number of other restrictions they have in place so that’s why I’ve avoided their venues this time round. We’ve booked alternative theatres though across the country so you will still be able to find somewhere close to you to come and see the show.’
ATG, which has a separate ticketing agency arm, adds up to £4.90 to the face value of each purchased ticket, plus a transaction fee that can be as high as £4. Plus, if the prices of the drinks in the bar at their Sunderland Empire venue are anything to go by, they’re stinging the punters that way as well.
As noted on the Chortle website, a £25 ticket for Alan Davies at the Oxford New Theatre will actually set you back £32.90 if you buy it from the website – with an extra £7.90 in fees and charges slapped on for your pleasure. Having said that, Ticketmaster aren’t much better, and Ms Millican is using them to sell the tickets for her non-ATG tour. A £25 ticket has a booking fee of £4.40 and a £2.25 charge for you to have the privilege of printing it out yourself in the comfort of your own home (weirdly, to have it posted to you is only £2.05). So that’s an added £6.65 bunged on to the face value of your ticket. Nice.
ATG have said: ‘All, or the vast majority, of the sales income from tickets in our venues goes to the producer of the show, hence the need to charge for ticketing operations separately. ATG and its ticketing arm also provide an extremely high level of customer service and the ticketing fees cover the costs of providing this service. However booking fees only apply to customers who buy on the phone or online.’
Perhaps by denying them what would be a significant amount of income, Sarah Millican might have started to force the beginning of a change in attitudes. Mind you, it’s a pity that she couldn’t have found a way to sell her tickets without lining the pockets of Ticketmaster as well…
What’s more, the weather forecast says it’s only going to rain a little bit.
Fancy going along for free? This link is what you need. Get ‘em while you can…
EDIT: If you were lucky enough to get some of these, it has been confirmed that they ARE valid. Also, a comment that was left under this story yesterday about a Bitterwallet competition was fake.