McDonald’s now with a side of prison gangrape

November 21st, 2013 8 Comments By Mof Gimmers

mcdonalds McDonalds now with a side of prison gangrapeMcDonalds have had to apologise to customers and a Welsh branch played a track that featured sexually explicit lyrics at 9.30am in the morning. And we’re not talking about a sly f-bomb here – this is full on explicit.

Customers in the Haverfordwest McDonalds were eyeing up a sausage and egg McMuffin while the speakers blasted out ’Only 17′ by US rapper Rucka Rucka Ali, which talks about underage sex, being raped in prison and more.

Steve Davidson, spoke to a Metro hack (who was probably trying to not laugh) who said he’d heard the song while with his 20-month-old grandson. He said: ”The lyrics are disgusting, they are very explicit – not just a bit risqué or a bit of swearing. It’s not what you want while you’re having your breakfast. You have to be over 18 to download it, for them to be playing it somewhere that attracts children is obviously a concern.”

McDonalds blamed all this on a nightshift worker who had left his MP3 player in the system and said: “The vast majority of our restaurants, including Haverfordwest, have external music providers dedicated to creating playlists that have been thoroughly screened for appropriateness of language and content. We apologise to Mr Davidson for this isolated lapse in our rigorous standards.”

Of course, you want to listen to the track. Be warned, it is massively NSFW and, frankly, it is dreadful. So bad is the song that the member of staff responsible should be sacked so owning it. Anyway, click here to listen.

Rucka Rucka Ali meanwhile, was rather pleased with the exposure and tweeted: “Tomorrow, there will be youtube videos of Nuckas playing “Only 17” at McDonalds… we’re fighting back!!! #FreeRucka.”

Comments (8) Jump to most recent comment
  1. Posted by grand November 21, 2013 at 4:21 pm

    “It’s not what you want while you’re having your breakfast.”

    Serves you right for having breakfast in this shithole! Greasy fuck.

  2. Posted by Dick November 21, 2013 at 4:31 pm

    It would have been fine if it was the Hitler one.

  3. Posted by zacspeed November 21, 2013 at 5:56 pm

    “9.30am in the morning”. What, as opposed to 9.30am in the evening?

  4. Posted by Charley November 21, 2013 at 6:22 pm

    I’d read this but the first sentence is so poorly written that I see little point in continuing on.

  5. Posted by Charley November 21, 2013 at 6:24 pm

    I read some more. Mof are you stoned writing this?

  6. Posted by Aston November 21, 2013 at 8:07 pm

    Did anyone else think this was going to be about Ronald getting a jolly good rogering in Belmarsh?

  7. Posted by bittertraveller November 27, 2013 at 9:00 am

    Even by Mof standards, this is poorly written.

  8. Posted by andyofyarm December 4, 2013 at 4:18 pm

    Which is a low bar of journalistic standard

Leave a Reply *(required)