Look at the size of that thing – the future of Apple

By Paul Smith

Bitterwallet - the future of Apple

  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Stuff, tech March 1st, 2010 | 19 Comments

This entry was posted on Monday, March 1st, 2010 at 3:30 pm and is filed under Stuff, tech. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

19 Responses to “Look at the size of that thing – the future of Apple”

  1. Posted by Jassen | March 1st, 2010 at 3:47 pm

    I look forward to a food-resistant iPlacemat, better yet, iBeermat

  2. Posted by maxtweenie | March 1st, 2010 at 4:01 pm

    And in every picture I can see an iTwat.

  3. Posted by Oliver McPhee | March 1st, 2010 at 4:13 pm

    I love the look of the iMat…

    Band-Hero is sooo outdated…

    Break-Hero here we come!

  4. Posted by Richard | March 1st, 2010 at 5:12 pm

    So you’re general point here is that the iPad is just a big iPhone… …. ….

    …

    Well fucking done…

  5. Posted by chris | March 1st, 2010 at 5:59 pm

    richard , your a dick

  6. Posted by The man from delmonte | March 1st, 2010 at 10:17 pm

    Chris, you cannot spell. It should have been “you’re” not “your”.

  7. Posted by Brian | March 1st, 2010 at 10:39 pm

    Hi, my name is Brian. Does anyone know how much the iBoard will cost? I’ve got £500 saved up for the iPad, so i need to know how many jobs around the house i have to do so i can purchase the iBoard on release day.
    Thanks

  8. Posted by Jack | March 2nd, 2010 at 2:48 am

    “The man from delmonte” Great, Captain Obvious strikes again! I’m glad we have people like you to patrol these comments, making sure everyone is following the laws of the interwebs.

    But seriously fuck you and fuck you Dick.

  9. Posted by Jack | March 2nd, 2010 at 2:50 am

    I enjoyed the post, I think these are good artists impressions of things to come, unless you have a time machine, and have taken these pictures, but have come back to the future to warn us!

  10. Posted by JJ | March 2nd, 2010 at 10:04 am

    The man from delmonte, it’s actually grammar and not spelling.

  11. Posted by JJ | March 2nd, 2010 at 10:05 am

    The man from delmonte, it’s also “can not”, two seperate words. Alternatively you could have gone with “can’t”.

  12. Posted by David Mitch | March 2nd, 2010 at 11:45 am

    It’s clearly balls, There is a camera app on the Iboard, Apple would never add something that useful.

  13. Posted by DBL | March 2nd, 2010 at 11:51 am

    JJ, you are incorrect on both counts.

  14. Posted by DBL | March 2nd, 2010 at 11:51 am

    P.S. Richard you’re a dick.

  15. Posted by The Doctor | March 2nd, 2010 at 12:54 pm

    I have just come back from the future, and there is only i….

  16. Posted by JJ | March 2nd, 2010 at 2:19 pm

    DBL is retarded.

  17. Posted by Andrew Robinson | March 2nd, 2010 at 7:25 pm

    FLAMEZ!

  18. Posted by -] | March 3rd, 2010 at 3:44 pm

    DBL might be retarded, but at least they are correct, unlike JJ.

    Cannot is correct. Can not is also correct, but far less common.

    Don’t take my word for it, ask Oxford: http://www.askoxford.com/asktheexperts/faq/aboutspelling/cannot

  19. Posted by Paranor | March 5th, 2010 at 7:27 pm

    Clearly, moving forward, by 2050 it will be i-world!

Leave a Reply