BT and Talk Talk lose filesharing appeal, which is nice

March 7th, 2012 5 Comments By Mof Gimmers

Picture 2 BT and Talk Talk lose filesharing appeal, which is niceBT and Talk Talk have lost an appeal over measures to tackle copyright infringement online. All the ISPs argued that the UK’s Digital Economy Act was incompatible with EU law, which says that they’ll have to be the ones to send warning letters to illegal downloaders as well as cutting users off.

The firms’ lawyers said that stricter measures could result in an invasion of privacy and create disproportionate costs for both ISPs and consumers.

In a statement, Talk Talk said it was now “considering our options”. They added: ”We’re disappointed that our appeal was unsuccessful though we welcome the additional legal clarity that has been provided for all parties. Though we have lost this appeal, we will continue fighting to defend our customers’ rights against this ill-judged legislation.”

A spokesman for BT said: “We have been seeking clarification from the courts that the DEA is consistent with European law, and legally robust in the UK, so that everyone can be confident in how it is implemented. Now that the court has made its decision, we will look at the judgment carefully to understand its implications and consider our next steps.”

Of course, the ISPs have been long chided by the creative industries. Christine Payne, general secretary of the Actors’ union Equity, called on the ISPs to “stop fighting and start obeying the law”. Through the medium of dance, she continued: ”Once again the court is on the side of the almost two million workers in the creative industries whose livelihoods are put at risk because creative content is stolen on a daily basis.”

Adam Rendle, a copyright specialist at international law firm Taylor Wessing, expects BT and Talk Talk to take this to the Supreme Court, saying: ”We know how keen internet users are to protect what they see as freedom of speech. When the Digital Economy Act itself was passed in the dying stages of the Labour government, there was a huge amount of disquiet that this kind of important legislation was being introduced without proper scrutiny.”

“That kind of disquiet didn’t result in the kind of action we’ve seen against Acta and Sopa. It wouldn’t be surprising to see a lot more public outcry than there was when the Act was first passed.”

Comments (5) Jump to most recent comment
  1. Posted by Martin March 7, 2012 at 2:45 pm

    Actors union, hilarious. If she honestly thinks her members are going to get more money because ISPs send nasty letters to their customers she really is living in world of make-believe.

  2. Posted by Skymarshall March 7, 2012 at 3:38 pm

    “Livelihoods are at risk”.

    Good God. So they get less than £1million per month. How ever will they survive?

  3. Posted by The Real Bob March 7, 2012 at 4:43 pm

    Perhaps they should stop people recording from the tv and radio too, after all it’s stopping all of those in the entertainment industry from earning money and must be putting people out of jobs.

  4. Posted by klingelton March 7, 2012 at 7:56 pm

    sky plus and virgin plus are both fucked then. don’t understand legally how that works…

  5. Posted by Al March 7, 2012 at 8:04 pm

    In other news, BT and Talk Talk report losses as consumers migrate to other ISPs. Really, why would anyone stay with these ISPs rather than changing to someone who wouldn’t send you a nasty letter?

Leave a Reply *(required)